Skip to main content
A clinical research trainer talking a small group of professionals through study documents around a meeting table

Clinical Research Monitoring Program (CRMP)

Move from site experience to monitoring evidence.

An applied monitoring competency program for experienced site professionals.

You already know how a site runs. Monitoring asks for a different set of judgments: what to review, what matters most, what counts as a finding, when to escalate, and how to document the follow-up. CRMP is where you practice those judgments on a real-shaped study and have the work reviewed by a person.

  • Seven weeks in total: a benchmark week, then six weeks of monitoring work
  • One simulated study and site, worked from qualification through escalation
  • Five reviewed monitoring work samples and one final challenge
  • A human defense decides what is marked verified, not a score on its own

Who CRMP is for

Built for people who already know how a site runs.

CRMP is an applied monitoring competency program for professionals who already understand how a site runs and now need to build monitoring judgment, execution, documentation, escalation and oversight capability.

A good fit if you are

  • Experienced clinical research coordinators and senior site professionals preparing for monitoring responsibilities
  • Site professionals moving toward CRA and monitoring pathways
  • Early monitoring professionals who need stronger applied monitoring judgment

Not the right program if

  • People new to clinical research with no site or study experience
  • Anyone looking for a certification that an employer is obliged to recognize
  • Anyone who wants a job placement service rather than a competency program

This is a standalone program. CRMP is a standalone program. It is not a second phase of the Clinical Research Entry Program and completing that program is not a requirement. Experienced site professionals apply directly. Entry is decided by application review of your readiness for monitoring work, not by a fixed number of years. We look at what you have actually done at a site or in a study team.

The gap

Site experience matters. It is not the same as monitoring readiness.

The question changes

At a site you ask what has to happen for this participant today. Monitoring asks whether the record proves what happened, and whether the study can rely on it.

You cannot review everything

Monitoring is prioritization. You decide where risk actually sits, what gets verified line by line, and what only gets read for quality.

Findings have to hold up

An observation is not a finding. A finding is written so a sponsor, an auditor and the next monitor read it the same way, with a cause, an owner and a date.

Escalation is a judgment

Knowing an issue is real is the easy part. Knowing when it stops being a site conversation and becomes a sponsor one is the part employers are hiring for.

How learning becomes evidence

Learn the work. Perform the work. Produce the evidence. Have the work reviewed.

  1. 01

    Benchmark

  2. 02

    Learn

  3. 03

    Perform

  4. 04

    Document

  5. 05

    Defend

  6. 06

    Verify

  7. 07

    Plan Next Step

You can enroll in the program. You cannot purchase a verified competency.

One study, all the way through

A single simulated study and site, not a set of disconnected exercises.

You meet the study in Week 0 and stay with it to the end. You qualify a site, prepare and work a visit, review the source, the database, the regulatory file and product accountability, raise findings, write the report and the follow-up, and watch what happens when problems repeat. Because it is one study, your decisions carry consequences into the next week.

It is built for learning and assessment. It is recorded as simulated work and is never presented as employment experience.

A clinical monitor comparing site data on a laptop against a printed source binder during a remote review

The journey

A benchmark week, then six weeks of monitoring work.

Week 0 establishes where you actually stand. Weeks 1 to 5 each build one part of the monitoring role and end in a reviewed work sample. Week 6 is the final challenge.

Developmental evidence

Five monitoring work samples, each reviewed by a person.

Each task is scored against five criteria and returned with written feedback: what you did well, what needs correcting, why it matters, and what to practice next. You get one resubmission on each. These are developmental evidence. They are never marked Human Verified.

  1. Week 1

    Monitoring Plan and Site Risk Map

    Read the study monitoring plan and the site's history, then set out what this site's monitoring actually has to cover, where the risk sits, and what you would prioritize at the next contact.

  2. Week 2

    Site Qualification and Activation Readiness Case

    Work a qualification package for a candidate site and produce a go or no-go recommendation, with the activation conditions you would attach to it.

  3. Week 3

    Monitoring Visit Execution Practicum

    Prepare and work an interim monitoring visit at the study site: set the agenda, review participant records, decide what to verify, and record what you reviewed and what you found.

  4. Week 4

    Findings, Report and Follow-up Package

    Turn what you found at the visit into a defensible set of findings, a monitoring visit report section, and a follow-up letter the site can actually act on.

  5. Week 5

    Risk Escalation and Quality Case

    Work a site whose problems are recurring rather than isolated. Decide what is systemic, what needs a corrective action, and what has to be escalated, and say when and to whom.

The final challenge

BORAKA Clinical Research Monitoring Challenge

A new site and study you have not seen before. You interpret the monitoring plan, prepare and prioritize a visit, review the participant records, source, database, regulatory file and product accountability, identify and classify findings, decide what to escalate, and produce the documentation. Then you explain your decisions to a reviewer.

Eight monitoring competency domains

  • Monitoring preparation and prioritization
  • Protocol and participant protection review
  • Source, data and query review
  • Investigational product and essential documents
  • Finding identification and classification
  • Reporting and follow-up
  • Risk escalation and quality judgment
  • Site communication and monitoring professionalism

Each of the eight monitoring domains is scored Not Yet Demonstrated, Developing or Demonstrated. A strong total never verifies every domain on its own. The overall standard is 13 of 16 points, with no critical domain scored Not Yet Demonstrated.

How it is run

  • No generative AI assistance of any kind.
  • No collaboration with peers or anyone else.
  • Independent work, completed inside the 180-minute window.
  • You must own every decision and rationale you submit.

After you submit, you sit a 20 to 30 minutes conversation with a reviewer and explain your decisions.

Two different outcomes

Completing the program is not the same as being verified.

Completion certificate

A record that you took part, submitted the work and met the participation requirements. It says what you did, not how well you did it.

Human Verification

Marked at the level of a single competency domain, and only where your final challenge work and your defense support it under reviewer signoff. Some domains may be verified and others not.

Finishing the program earns a completion certificate. It does not by itself mean a competency is verified. A competency is marked Human Verified only where your final challenge work and your defense support it under human review.

What you leave with

Work you can show, and a clear picture of where you stand.

By the end of the program

  • A monitoring baseline profile and a development plan built from your own benchmark
  • Five reviewed monitoring work samples with written feedback on each
  • A monitoring visit report section and a follow-up letter you produced yourself
  • A risk and escalation case you can talk through in an interview
  • A final challenge result and, where the review supports it, verified monitoring competencies in your Competency Passport

Included

Career Launch Package, included

Every enrolled learner receives

  • A Career Readiness Review that compares your monitoring evidence, your actual site experience, the monitoring role you are targeting and the gaps that remain
  • A professional resume revamp aligned to one primary target role
  • A LinkedIn profile revamp
  • A personalized interview preparation strategy
  • One year of Premium BORAKA Network membership, activated at program completion

90 days of Competency Labs

Access to BORAKA Competency Labs from your cohort start day, so you can keep practicing monitoring judgment after the program ends.

How the readiness review works

The readiness review can recommend an independent search, more time in Competency Labs, an adjacent role, or optional Career Services. It never pushes you into a paid service by default.

What is not included

Career and job search execution, including managed applications, reverse recruiting, recruiter outreach, job by job resume tailoring and unlimited interview coaching, is not included in CRMP and remains a separate optional Career Service.

Time commitment

What the program asks of your week.

Each week

  • One live Competency Studio each week, with a recording if you cannot attend live
  • An Applied Practicum block after each studio, worked in your own time
  • One monitoring Evidence Task in each of Weeks 1 to 5
  • Plan on roughly eight to ten hours a week across the program
  • Nothing is due and no sessions run during the holiday pause

Winter 2026/27 cohort

Dates, the holiday pause, and tuition.

Week 0, benchmark
November 23 to 29, 2026
Weeks 1 to 3
November 30 to December 19, 2026
Holiday pause
December 20, 2026 to January 3, 2027
Weeks 4 to 6
January 4 to 23, 2027

The holiday pause

The program pauses for the holidays from December 20, 2026 to January 3, 2027. Nothing is due and no sessions run during the pause. Instruction restarts on January 4, 2027 and runs to January 23, 2027.

Tuition

$2,997

Winter 2026/27 is the transition cohort and tuition is held at $2,997. There is no additional early bird discount on this cohort. The protected price applies to this cohort only.

Applications for this cohort close on November 20, 2026.

Tuition from 2027

Early bird, paid in full
$3,197

One payment.

Early bird, three payments
3 x $1,199

$3,597 in total, one payment a month for three months.

Standard, paid in full
$3,497

One payment.

Standard, three payments
3 x $1,299

$3,897 in total, one payment a month for three months.

Early bird applies while places remain in the early group and only up to the priority date on that cohort. A payment plan is three payments and then it stops. Winter 2026/27 keeps its protected price of $2,997, paid in full.

Application and review

What happens after you apply.

  1. 01

    Apply

    A short application about your site or study experience and the monitoring work you are moving toward. You get a reference code straight away.

  2. 02

    Review

    We read every application ourselves. The decision is about readiness for monitoring work, not a number of years.

  3. 03

    Decision

    You are accepted, waitlisted, asked for more information, or declined. Every decision comes with a reason.

  4. 04

    Agreement and tuition

    Accepted applicants sign the enrollment agreement, then pay. Your workspace opens once we activate your place.

Applying is not an offer of a place, does not hold a seat, and costs nothing.

Claim boundaries

What CRMP does not promise.

CRMP does not

  • It is not a legal or regulatory qualification
  • It does not promise a CRA role, a placement, a promotion or a salary
  • It does not replace an employer's own judgment, interviews or requirements
  • Finishing the program does not by itself verify a competency
  • Simulated monitoring work is not employment experience
  • It says nothing about competencies we did not assess

Questions

Questions people ask before applying.

Winter 2026/27 applications

Learn the work. Perform the work. Produce the evidence. Have the work reviewed.

We read every application ourselves and reply with a decision and a reason. Nothing is charged when you apply.

Apply for Winter 2026/27